Thursday, August 16, 2012

Uncle Tom's Justice Department

Take heed Obama supporters (of course, it was no different under Bush II and would be no different under Romney), but your beloved Hope and Change President is overseeing the greatest wave of fraud, corruption and wealth confiscation in the history our country.

Anyone who really cares to understand the extent to which Obama's Justice Department is enabling the process of systemic corruption and collapse should read this scathing article by Matt Taibi:  LINK

Anyone who still defends Obama must read that - otherwise you have no business even voting.  Lew Rockwell wrote a brief editorial in which he correctly argues that the best choice for Americans is to not vote.  I made this argument in 2008 and was derided by all the supposed "patriots." Now I have several friends/colleagues who understand that not voting is better than voting:
On the other hand, we do have the freedom not to vote. No one has yet drafted us into the voting booth. I suggest that we exercise this right not to participate. It is one of the few rights we have left. Nonparticipation sends a message that we no longer believe in the racket they have cooked up for us, and we want no part of it...This year especially there is no lesser of two evils. There is socialism or fascism. The true American spirit should guide every voter to have no part of either.
Here's the LINK

Until the population of this country forces a "reset," we have collapsed into a country in which Rule of Law has become Rule by Men and Habeas Corpus has become Mortuus Corpus.

16 comments:

  1. No business even voting...why don't we just leave it at that !

    If 40 % of the eligible voting population of the United States was to not vote for anyone come this November , a VERY STRONG message would be received. It would be like hitting a politician in Washington DC over the head with a 2X4 !

    Pity That !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you don't vote, the message received will be 'full steam ahead'. If you vote for the Libertarian party, maybe they will get enough % to join the 2-party duopoly and provide some small-govt influence on the process.

      Will you sit at home in your smuggness of how correct you are, or help out a 3rd party with a few votes?

      Delete
    2. If you don't vote, the message received will be 'full steam ahead'. If you vote for the Libertarian party, maybe they will get enough % to join the 2-party duopoly and provide some small-govt influence on the process.

      Will you sit at home in your smuggness of how correct you are, or help out a 3rd party with a few votes?

      Delete
  2. this country is about what it (mostly) deserves. At all levels, from the corrupt banksters et all, to the union employees to the underclass on all sorts of welfare and not even trying we might as well hear the chant "we want" .

    So they vote and they get what they wanted--and as a consequence the electorate of this country has "killed the golden goose", pardon the expression.

    People talk and bitch about what the right thing to do but when someone comes forward and offers it (ie Simpson Bowles (and that was watered down)or Ron Paul (he is a tad too focused but gets the economic issues nuts on correct) they get pushed aside.

    So the majority rules--even if they are too dumb and selfish to vote.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think a spoilt vote sends a stronger message than a no show!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. ....and it looks like Corzine is getting off scot free...and ready to
    move on as a new hedge fund manager. God, is there no justice!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Which is why I've always made the argument that voting ought to be a privilege and not a right, since the average Jane and Joe are too ignorant to be aware of what they're doing. Hell, I need a license to operate a motor vehicle since any ignorance on my part can be fatal not just to myself but to others as well, so why not some type of licensing arrangement before being allowed to cast a ballot? Especially when the repercussions affect anyone and everyone? The concept of being permitted to vote simply based on age alone, without demonstrating a spark of perspicacity or maturity, strikes me as insane. On a side note, I do not believe that those who draw social assistance on a continuous and permanent basis should be allowed to vote. Why should they be accorded the same power when their only vested interest in society is to milk it, and me the taxpayer, of every cent possible. It's bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before you even focus on the voter and how they should be positioned regarding their credentials , how about first concentrating on who it is who's running for office. It seems that you might be putting the cart before the horse. Let's have some reliable leadership before us or the whole episode is a giant charade and waste of time to begin with!

      Delete
  6. Richard Duncan on Riding out this Depression on a Deflationary Debt Raft!

    As the economic crisis unfolds, and we see evidence of
    'crony-capitalism' and 'corportasim', we wonder if capitalism even
    still exists. Our guest, Richard Duncan, believes we live in a system
    he calls 'creditism.'

    We talk to Richard Duncan, Chief Economist for Blackhorse Asset
    Management, about the future of gold as a monetary metal and how the
    abandonment of the gold standard has fostered a boom in credit and
    debt that may not longer be sustainable. The choice could be one of
    devastating inflationary fires, or freezing deflationary ice!

    http://youtu.be/iquemUNNYY8

    ReplyDelete
  7. When one considers that democracy amounts to nothing more than two wolves and one sheep deciding what's for dinner, all I can say is that democracy sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  8. “If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.” - Mark Twain

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here in Oz it's compulsory to vote or receive a $50 fine. My vote is important and hence I revel in this opportunity.

    I am well armed with a packet of texta pens and crayons and spend alot of time in that booth, more than most, drawing pictures of pigs with their snouts in the trough, erect and flacid penises, a pair of hairy balls and usually come up with some interesting comments for the tick boxes. 7 boxes is good for "Eat Shit" - if you get my drift.

    Makes me feel part of this voting scam and no doubt gives someone counting a good laugh!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I feel like this is the result of the feeling of powerlessness. I don't know that I like the idea of not voting but I certainly understand the thoughts behind it and the emotions.

    I've come to the conclusion that I'm going to write in the person I believe would best serve the country welfare, Ron Paul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In most locales, a write-in is wasted, and typically wastes the entire ballot.

      If Ron Paul is not the Republican nominee, consider using your votes to help the 3rd parties. In that way your vote and your displeasure are counted.

      Delete
  11. "(Not voting)... one of the last rights we have left?" Last I checked you still have the right to go to your dumb goldbug conventions (peaceably assemble), say whatever dumb idea you want in your blogs (speech and press), shoot at thugs who break into your house to steal your Gold Eagles (bear arms), tell the fuzz they can't search your silver round stash without a warrant (unreasonable search and seizure), not be tried for manufacturing your own Ron Paul-face Liberty currency twice (double jeopardy), .... and so on.

    And your friend above will take my right to vote--no matter how stupid I may be--from my COLD DEAD HANDS.

    Love it or leave it, Goldbugs!

    ReplyDelete